<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?>

<rdf:RDF
 xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
 xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"
 xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/"
 xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
 xmlns:syn="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
 xmlns:prism="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/prism/"
 xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
>

<channel rdf:about="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org">
<title>Annals of Oncology - current issue</title>
<link>http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org</link>
<description>Annals of Oncology - RSS feed of current issue</description>
<prism:eIssn>1569-8041</prism:eIssn>
<prism:coverDisplayDate>August 2008</prism:coverDisplayDate>
<prism:publicationName>Annals of Oncology</prism:publicationName>
<prism:issn>0923-7534</prism:issn>
<items>
 <rdf:Seq>
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/19/8/1365?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/19/8/1367?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/19/8/1369?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/19/8/1371?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/19/8/1379?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/19/8/1387?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/19/8/1393?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/19/8/1402?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/19/8/1407?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/19/8/1417?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/19/8/1423?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/19/8/1430?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/19/8/1435?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/19/8/1442?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/19/8/1450?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/19/8/1458?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/19/8/1465?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/19/8/1470?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/19/8/1477?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/19/8/1485?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/19/8/1488?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/19/8/1495?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/19/8/1500?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/19/8/1509?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/19/8/1509-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/19/8/1510?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/19/8/1511?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/19/8/1512?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/19/8/1512-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/19/8/1515?rss=1" />
 </rdf:Seq>
</items>
</channel>

<item rdf:about="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/19/8/1365?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[In this issue]]></title>
<link>http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/19/8/1365?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-07-28</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/annonc/mdn534</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[In this issue]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>European Society for Medical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>8</prism:number>
<prism:volume>19</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>1365</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-08-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>1365</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>in this issue</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/19/8/1367?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Creating a stronger front against cancer: ESMO and ECCO join forces]]></title>
<link>http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/19/8/1367?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[On behalf of ESMO, Baselga, J.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-07-28</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/annonc/mdn425</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Creating a stronger front against cancer: ESMO and ECCO join forces]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>European Society for Medical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>8</prism:number>
<prism:volume>19</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>1368</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-08-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>1367</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>editorials</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/19/8/1369?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Temsirolimus in metastatic renal cell carcinoma]]></title>
<link>http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/19/8/1369?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Negrier, S.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-07-28</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/annonc/mdn373</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Temsirolimus in metastatic renal cell carcinoma]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>European Society for Medical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>8</prism:number>
<prism:volume>19</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>1370</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-08-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>1369</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>editorials</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/19/8/1371?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[UFT (tegafur-uracil) in rectal cancer]]></title>
<link>http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/19/8/1371?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><b>Background:</b> Major achievements in the treatment of localised rectal cancer include the development of total mesorectal excision and the perioperative administration of radiotherapy in combination with continuous infusion (CI) 5-fluorouracil (5-FU). This multimodal approach has resulted in extended survival and lower local relapse rates, with the potential for sphincter-preserving procedures. However, CI 5-FU is inconvenient for patients and is costly. Oral fluoropyrimidines like UFT (tegafur&ndash;uracil) offer a number of advantages over 5-FU.</p>
<p><b>Methods:</b> We undertook a review of published articles and abstracts relating to clinical studies of UFT in the treatment of locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC). Pre- and postoperative studies carried out in patients with newly diagnosed or recurrent disease were included.</p>
<p><b>Results:</b> The combination of UFT and radiotherapy was effective and well tolerated in the preoperative setting, while adjuvant UFT improved survival and reduced distant relapse compared with surgery alone. The efficacy of UFT appears comparable with that of 5-FU and capecitabine and its side-effect profile is favourable.</p>
<p><b>Conclusion:</b> Clinical experience to date suggests that UFT is a valuable treatment option for the perioperative treatment of LARC. Further improvements in patient outcomes may result from the combination of UFT with targeted agents.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Casado, E., Pfeiffer, P., Feliu, J., Gonzalez-Baron, M., Vestermark, L., Jensen, H. A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-07-28</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[2008 - Review Articles]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/annonc/mdn067</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[UFT (tegafur-uracil) in rectal cancer]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>European Society for Medical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>8</prism:number>
<prism:volume>19</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>1378</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-08-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>1371</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>reviews</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/19/8/1379?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Targeting Src in breast cancer]]></title>
<link>http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/19/8/1379?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>The clinical benefit of blocking oncogenic pathways in breast cancer and other malignancies has validated this approach and ushered in the era of molecularly targeted therapeutics. Src and its family members make up the largest group of nonreceptor tyrosine kinases. In laboratory models, these proteins have been shown to play a critical role in cellular growth and proliferation, angiogenesis, and invasion and metastasis. In addition, Src plays an important role in osteoclast activation and bone resorption, which are often aberrantly activated in the setting of bone metastases. Given its role in these functions, blocking Src kinase would be predicted to have a broad therapeutic benefit in patients with Src-dependent cancers. In this review, we highlight the rationale for targeting Src in breast cancer, including laboratory and clinical data implicating it in these signaling pathways, and review small-molecule tyrosine kinase inhibitors currently in clinical development. Identifying which patients should be selected for Src-directed therapies will be important to the clinical success of these agents. Importantly, recent preclinical data support a role for this class of inhibitors in basal-type/triple-negative breast cancer, which represents a group of patients with limited effective treatment options.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Finn, R. S.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-07-28</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[2008 - Review Articles]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/annonc/mdn291</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Targeting Src in breast cancer]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>European Society for Medical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>8</prism:number>
<prism:volume>19</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>1386</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-08-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>1379</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>reviews</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/19/8/1387?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Temsirolimus safety profile and management of toxic effects in patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma and poor prognostic features]]></title>
<link>http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/19/8/1387?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><b>Background:</b> Temsirolimus, a novel inhibitor of mammalian target of rapamycin, has demonstrated prolonged overall survival and progression-free survival compared with interferon alfa (IFN) in patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma (RCC) and poor prognostic features. Adverse events (AEs) of any causality were previously reported, but AEs that were deemed temsirolimus related are of particular relevance for poor-risk patients and for defining mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitor-specific side-effects.</p>
<p><b>Patients and methods:</b> Patients with advanced RCC, no prior systemic therapy, and three or more of six poor-risk factors were randomly assigned to one of three groups: (i) IFN s.c. up to 18 MU thrice weekly, (ii) temsirolimus i.v. 25 mg weekly, or (iii) temsirolimus i.v. 15 mg weekly plus interferon s.c. 6 MU thrice weekly.</p>
<p><b>Results:</b> Among 208 patients, the most common temsirolimus-related grades 3&ndash;4 AEs were anemia (13%), hyperglycemia (9%), and asthenia (8%). Grades 3&ndash;4 hypercholesterolemia (1%), hypertriglyceridemia (3%), and hypophosphatemia (4%) were also seen. Although pneumonitis occurred infrequently, vigilance for its development is needed. Guidelines for management of toxic effects are presented on the basis of available clinical experience.</p>
<p><b>Conclusions:</b> Temsirolimus-related grades 3&ndash;4 AEs were primarily metabolic in nature and easily controlled medically. In general, these did not negatively impact patient quality of life.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bellmunt, J., Szczylik, C., Feingold, J., Strahs, A., Berkenblit, A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-07-28</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/annonc/mdn066</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Temsirolimus safety profile and management of toxic effects in patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma and poor prognostic features]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>European Society for Medical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>8</prism:number>
<prism:volume>19</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>1392</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-08-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>1387</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>oncology practice</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/19/8/1393?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Extracapsular tumor spread and the risk of local, axillary and supraclavicular recurrence in node-positive, premenopausal patients with breast cancer]]></title>
<link>http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/19/8/1393?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><b>Background:</b> Extracapsular tumor spread (ECS) has been identified as a possible risk factor for breast cancer recurrence, but controversy exists regarding its role in decision making for regional radiotherapy. This study evaluates ECS as a predictor of local, axillary, and supraclavicular recurrence.</p>
<p><b>Patients and methods:</b> International Breast Cancer Study Group Trial VI accrued 1475 eligible pre- and perimenopausal women with node-positive breast cancer who were randomly assigned to receive three to nine courses of classical combination chemotherapy with cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, and fluorouracil. ECS status was determined retrospectively in 933 patients based on review of pathology reports. Cumulative incidence and hazard ratios (HRs) were estimated using methods for competing risks analysis. Adjustment factors included treatment group and baseline patient and tumor characteristics. The median follow-up was 14 years.</p>
<p><b>Results:</b> In univariable analysis, ECS was significantly associated with supraclavicular recurrence (HR = 1.96; 95% confidence interval 1.23&ndash;3.13; <I>P</I> = 0.005). HRs for local and axillary recurrence were 1.38 (<I>P</I> = 0.06) and 1.81 (<I>P</I> = 0.11), respectively. Following adjustment for number of lymph node metastases and other baseline prognostic factors, ECS was not significantly associated with any of the three recurrence types studied.</p>
<p><b>Conclusions:</b> Our results indicate that the decision for additional regional radiotherapy should not be based solely on the presence of ECS.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Gruber, G., Cole, B. F., Castiglione-Gertsch, M., Holmberg, S. B., Lindtner, J., Golouh, R., Collins, J., Crivellari, D., Thurlimann, B., Simoncini, E., Fey, M. F., Gelber, R. D., Coates, A. S., Price, K. N., Goldhirsch, A., Viale, G., Gusterson, B. A., for the International Breast Cancer Study Group]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-07-28</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/annonc/mdn123</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Extracapsular tumor spread and the risk of local, axillary and supraclavicular recurrence in node-positive, premenopausal patients with breast cancer]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>European Society for Medical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>8</prism:number>
<prism:volume>19</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>1401</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-08-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>1393</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>breast cancer</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/19/8/1402?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Modulation of ER phosphorylation on serine 118 by endocrine therapy: a new surrogate marker for efficacy]]></title>
<link>http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/19/8/1402?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><b>Background:</b> Phosphorylation of serine 118 (ser118) has been reported to be involved in the activation of estrogen receptor (ER). In the present study, we evaluated whether endocrine therapy modulated ER phosphorylation on ser118.</p>
<p><b>Patients and methods:</b> We carried out a tissue microarray that included 80 primary breast tumors obtained before the administration of endocrine therapy. A second tissue microarray included 52 tumors obtained after endocrine therapy from the same patients. Immunostainings were carried out for ER, Pser118ER, Her2, insulin growth factor receptor (IGFR), p21-activated kinase 1 (PAK1), pMAPK, bcl2 and progesterone receptor.</p>
<p><b>Results:</b> Pser118ER staining was higher in Her2- (<I>P</I> = 0.06), IGFR- (<I>P</I> = 0.0002) and pMAPK-expressing tumors (<I>P</I> = 0.001). The level of ER phosphorylation was not different according to the occurrence of clinical tumor response (<I>P</I> = 0.16). Pser118ER expression was significantly reduced by endocrine therapy. The mean Pser118ER score was 163 [standard deviation (SD) 81] before endocrine therapy and 80 (SD 90) after endocrine therapy (<I>P</I> = 0.0001, paired <I>t</I>-test). The magnitude of Pser118ER decrease was higher in tumors that responded to endocrine therapy (mean decrease 128, SD 86) as compared with refractory tumors (mean decrease 38, SD 130) (<I>P</I> = 0.017, <I>t</I>-test).</p>
<p><b>Conclusion:</b> These findings suggest that endocrine therapy modulates ER on ser118. Pser118ER immunostaining could be used as surrogate marker to monitor treatment efficacy.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Zoubir, M., Mathieu, M. C., Mazouni, C., Liedtke, C., Corley, L., Geha, S., Bouaziz, J., Spielmann, M., Drusche, F., Symmans, W. F., Delaloge, S., Andre, F.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-07-28</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/annonc/mdn151</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Modulation of ER phosphorylation on serine 118 by endocrine therapy: a new surrogate marker for efficacy]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>European Society for Medical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>8</prism:number>
<prism:volume>19</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>1406</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-08-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>1402</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>breast cancer</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/19/8/1407?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Practical guidance for the management of aromatase inhibitor-associated bone loss]]></title>
<link>http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/19/8/1407?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><b>Background:</b> Recent studies indicate that women with breast cancer are at increased risk of fracture compared with their age-matched peers. Current treatment guidelines are inadequate for averting fractures in osteopenic women, especially those receiving aromatase inhibitor (AI) therapy. Therefore, we sought to identify clinically relevant risk factors for fracture that can be used to assess overall fracture risk and to provide practical guidance for preventing and treating bone loss in women with breast cancer receiving AI therapy.</p>
<p><b>Methods:</b> Systematic review of pertinent information from published literature and meeting abstracts through December 2007 was carried out to identify factors contributing to fracture risk in women with breast cancer. An evidence-based medicine approach was used to select risk factors that can be used to determine when to initiate bisphosphonate treatment of aromatase inhibitor-associated bone loss (AIBL).</p>
<p><b>Results:</b> Fracture risk factors were chosen from large, well-designed, controlled, population-based trials in postmenopausal women. Evidence from multiple prospective clinical trials in women with breast cancer was used to validate AI therapy as a fracture risk factor. Overall, eight fracture risk factors were validated in women with breast cancer: AI therapy, T-score &lt;&ndash;1.5, age &gt;65 years, low body mass index (BMI &lt;20 kg/m<sup>2</sup>), family history of hip fracture, personal history of fragility fracture after age 50, oral corticosteroid use &gt;6 months, and smoking. Treatment recommendations were derived from randomized clinical trials.</p>
<p><b>Conclusions:</b> The authors recommend the following for preventing and treating AIBL in women with breast cancer. All patients initiating AI therapy should receive calcium and vitamin D supplements. Any patient initiating or receiving AI therapy with a T-score &ge;&ndash;2.0 and no additional risk factors should be monitored every 1&ndash;2 years for change in risk status and bone mineral density (BMD). Any patient initiating or receiving AI therapy with a T-score &lt;&ndash;2.0 should receive bisphosphonate therapy. Any patient initiating or receiving AI therapy with any two of the following risk factors&mdash;T-score &lt;&ndash;1.5, age &gt;65 years, low BMI (&lt;20 kg/m<sup>2</sup>), family history of hip fracture, personal history of fragility fracture after age 50, oral corticosteroid use &gt;6 months, and smoking&mdash;should receive bisphosphonate therapy. BMD should be monitored every 2 years, and treatment should continue for at least 2 years and possibly for as long as AI therapy is continued. To date, the overwhelming majority of clinical evidence supports zoledronic acid 4 mg every 6 months to prevent bone loss in women at high risk. Although there is a trend towards fewer fractures with zoledronic acid, studies completed to date have not been designed to capture significant differences in fracture rate, and longer follow-up is needed.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Hadji, P., Body, J. -J., Aapro, M. S., Brufsky, A., Coleman, R. E., Guise, T., Lipton, A., Tubiana-Hulin, M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-07-28</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/annonc/mdn164</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Practical guidance for the management of aromatase inhibitor-associated bone loss]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>European Society for Medical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>8</prism:number>
<prism:volume>19</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>1416</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-08-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>1407</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>breast cancer</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/19/8/1417?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Phase II study of sequentially administered low-dose mitomycin-C (MMC) and irinotecan (CPT-11) in women with metastatic breast cancer (MBC)]]></title>
<link>http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/19/8/1417?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><b>Background:</b> Preclinical studies show that mitomycin-C (MMC) followed by irinotecan (CPT-11) is synergistic. Therefore, we evaluated the toxicity and efficacy of sequentially administered low-dose MMC and CPT-11 in patients (pts) with pretreated metastatic breast cancer (MBC). Secondary objective was to evaluate the correlation between MMC-induced topoisomerase I (TOPO I) expression and NAD(P)H:quinone oxireductase 1 (NQO1) genotypes in peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) and efficacy or toxicity of the regimen.</p>
<p><b>Design:</b> Thirty-two pts received MMC i.v. 6 mg/m<sup>2</sup> day 1 and CPT-11 i.v. 125 mg/m<sup>2</sup> days 2 and 8 every 28 days for maximum of six cycles. TOPO I expression and NQO1 reductase genotyping in 23 of 32 (72%) pts were assayed by PCR.</p>
<p><b>Results:</b> The median time to progression (TTP) was 4.7 months (95% confidence interval 4.0&ndash;5.4 months). TOPO I expression was increased 5- to 10-fold and 20- to 30-fold in PBMC at 24 and 168 h, respectively. There was no relationship between these markers and efficacy or toxicity of the regimen.</p>
<p><b>Conclusions:</b> Sequential low-dose MMC and CPT-11 was active and tolerable by pretreated MBC pts. Future trials should focus on less pretreated MBC pts and sequential tumor biopsies to test the hypothesis that increased intratumoral expression of TOPO I is related to efficacy.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mrozek, E., Kolesar, J., Young, D., Allen, J., Villalona-Calero, M., Shapiro, C. L.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-07-28</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/annonc/mdn154</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Phase II study of sequentially administered low-dose mitomycin-C (MMC) and irinotecan (CPT-11) in women with metastatic breast cancer (MBC)]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>European Society for Medical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>8</prism:number>
<prism:volume>19</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>1422</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-08-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>1417</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>breast cancer</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/19/8/1423?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Association between CYP2D6 *10 genotype and survival of breast cancer patients receiving tamoxifen treatment]]></title>
<link>http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/19/8/1423?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><b>Background:</b> Human cytochrome P450 2D6 (CYP2D6) genotype may affect the efficacy of tamoxifen treatment in Caucasian women with breast cancer. The most common polymorphism of CYP2D6 in Chinese women is variant 10 (188 C to T).</p>
<p><b>Patients and methods:</b> Tamoxifen and 4-hydroxytamoxifen (4OHtam) were measured in the serum of 37 women with breast cancer who were receiving tamoxifen treatment. The association between CYP2D6 *10 genotype and survival was determined in a cohort of 293 women with breast cancer who received tamoxifen (<I>n</I> = 152) or who did not (<I>n</I> = 141).</p>
<p><b>Results:</b> The serum 4OHtam concentrations were significantly lower in women with the CYP2D6 *10 homozygous variant T/T genotype than in those with the homozygous wild-type C/C genotype (<I>P</I> = 0.04). Among tamoxifen-treated women, women with the T/T genotype had a significantly worse disease-free survival (DFS) than those with the C/C or C/T genotype, and the T/T genotype remained an independent prognostic factor of DFS in multivariate analysis (hazard ratio = 4.7; 95% confidence interval = 1.1&ndash;20.0; <I>P</I> = 0.04). Among women who did not receive tamoxifen, there was no significant association between CYP2D6 *10 genotype and survival.</p>
<p><b>Conclusion:</b> In tamoxifen-treated patients, women with the CYP2D6 *10 T/T genotype have a lower 4OHtam level in the serum and a worse clinical outcome.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Xu, Y., Sun, Y., Yao, L., Shi, L., Wu, Y., Ouyang, T., Li, J., Wang, T., Fan, Z., Fan, T., Lin, B., He, L., Li, P., Xie, Y.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-07-28</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/annonc/mdn155</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Association between CYP2D6 *10 genotype and survival of breast cancer patients receiving tamoxifen treatment]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>European Society for Medical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>8</prism:number>
<prism:volume>19</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>1429</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-08-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>1423</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>breast cancer</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/19/8/1430?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Satisfaction with and psychological impact of immediate and deferred breast reconstruction]]></title>
<link>http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/19/8/1430?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><b>Background:</b> The present work assesses the effect of immediate breast reconstruction (IBR), deferred breast reconstruction (DBR), and no breast reconstruction on the psychological impact.</p>
<p><b>Patients and methods:</b> Standard questionnaires were used to determine the psychological impact suffered by patients who underwent IBR, DBR and no reconstruction, their degree of satisfaction with the results achieved, and their postprocedure opinions regarding reconstruction options.</p>
<p><b>Results:</b> A total of 526 women underwent mastectomy. The response rate to the questionnaires was 71.67%. A significantly greater proportion of the women who underwent no reconstruction suffered psychological problems than those who underwent reconstruction of some type (<I>P</I> = 0.01). Some 94.77% of the women who underwent IBR maintained a postprocedure preference for this option; in contrast, some 87.27% of the DBR and 56.14% of the no-reconstruction patients declared a postprocedure preference for IBR. In all, 63.49% of the women who underwent reconstruction were moderately very satisfied with the aesthetic results achieved, while only 22.80% of the no-reconstruction patients declared such satisfaction (<I>P</I> = 0.0001).</p>
<p><b>Conclusions:</b> The women who underwent no breast reconstruction suffered more emotional problems than those who underwent a reconstruction procedure. In general, all groups reported a postprocedure preference for IBR in their questionnaire answers. The aesthetic results achieved by IBR seem to be those best accepted.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Fernandez-Delgado, J., Lopez-Pedraza, M. J., Blasco, J. A., Andradas-Aragones, E., Sanchez-Mendez, J. I., Sordo-Miralles, G., Reza, M. M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-07-28</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/annonc/mdn153</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Satisfaction with and psychological impact of immediate and deferred breast reconstruction]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>European Society for Medical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>8</prism:number>
<prism:volume>19</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>1434</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-08-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>1430</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>breast cancer</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/19/8/1435?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Survival and reproductive function of 52 women treated with surgery and bleomycin, etoposide, cisplatin (BEP) chemotherapy for ovarian yolk sac tumor]]></title>
<link>http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/19/8/1435?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><b>Background:</b> Ovarian yolk sac tumor (YST) is a very rare malignancy arising in young women. Chemotherapy has dramatically improved the prognosis. Current treatment consists of surgery followed by bleomycin, etoposide, and cisplatin (BEP) chemotherapy. However, given the rarity of this tumor, ovarian YST-specific survival and outcome after such treatment are not precisely known.</p>
<p><b>Patients and methods:</b> This report concerns prospectively recorded cases that were either treated at Institut Gustave Roussy (Villejuif, France) or referred there for advice about therapy. From 1990 to 2006, 52 patients underwent surgery followed by BEP chemotherapy. Data on patient characteristics, treatment, survival, and fertility outcome were analyzed to assess treatment efficacy and gonadal toxicity after achieving a complete remission.</p>
<p><b>Results:</b> Thirty-five patients had stage I/II tumors while 17 patients presented with stage III/IV disease. With a median follow-up of 68 months, the overall 5-year survival and disease-free survival rates were 94% and 90%, respectively. Forty-one women underwent fertility-sparing surgery. Pregnancy was achieved in 12 of 16 (75%) women who attempted conception. Overall, 19 pregnancies have been recorded.</p>
<p><b>Conclusions:</b> BEP chemotherapy following fertility-sparing surgery is a very effective treatment of ovarian YSTs. Most of the patients who attempt conception after complete remission will have children.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[de La Motte Rouge, T., Pautier, P., Duvillard, P., Rey, A., Morice, P., Haie-Meder, C., Kerbrat, P., Culine, S., Troalen, F., Lhomme, C.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-07-28</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/annonc/mdn162</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Survival and reproductive function of 52 women treated with surgery and bleomycin, etoposide, cisplatin (BEP) chemotherapy for ovarian yolk sac tumor]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>European Society for Medical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>8</prism:number>
<prism:volume>19</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>1441</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-08-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>1435</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>gynecologic tumors</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/19/8/1442?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Cetuximab in combination with weekly 5-fluorouracil/folinic acid and oxaliplatin (FUFOX) in untreated patients with advanced colorectal cancer: a phase Ib/II study of the AIO GI Group]]></title>
<link>http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/19/8/1442?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><b>Background:</b> This two-part phase Ib/II study investigated the feasibility of administering cetuximab in combination with oxaliplatin and infusional 5-fluorouracil (5-FU)/folinic acid (FA) in a weekly schedule (AIO FUFOX protocol) as first-line treatment in patients with epidermal growth factor receptor-detectable advanced colorectal cancer.</p>
<p><b>Patients and methods:</b> Cetuximab was administered weekly: 400 mg/m<sup>2</sup> initial dose, then 250 mg/m<sup>2</sup> and FUFOX: oxaliplatin 50 mg/m<sup>2</sup>, FA 500 mg/m<sup>2</sup> and 5-FU as a 24-h infusion at either 1500 or 2000 mg/m<sup>2</sup> administered for 4 weeks followed by a 1-week rest (one cycle).</p>
<p><b>Results:</b> Dose-limiting toxicity (grade 3 diarrhea) occurred in 3 of 14 assessable patients receiving 5-FU at standard 2000 mg/m<sup>2</sup>. This dose was administered to a further 25 patients. Cetuximab combined with FUFOX was generally well tolerated with the most common grade 3/4 adverse events being diarrhea (27%) and paresthesia (16%). The confirmed response rate for patients receiving 5-FU at standard 2000 mg/m<sup>2</sup> (<I>N</I> = 41) was 56%, with a median duration of 9.3 months. Median progression-free and overall survival times including all 49 patients were 8.1 (95% confidence interval 6.0&ndash;9.7) and 28.2 months, respectively. Cetuximab pharmacokinetics seemed not to be different for combination with FUFOX compared with cetuximab/irinotecan combinations.</p>
<p><b>Conclusion:</b> This protocol is well tolerated and shows promising efficacy supporting further investigation.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Arnold, D., Hohler, T., Dittrich, C., Lordick, F., Seufferlein, T., Riemann, J., Woll, E., Herrmann, T., Zubel, A., Schmoll, H.-J.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-07-28</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/annonc/mdn150</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Cetuximab in combination with weekly 5-fluorouracil/folinic acid and oxaliplatin (FUFOX) in untreated patients with advanced colorectal cancer: a phase Ib/II study of the AIO GI Group]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>European Society for Medical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>8</prism:number>
<prism:volume>19</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>1449</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-08-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>1442</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>gastrointestinal tumors</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/19/8/1450?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Randomized phase III study comparing irinotecan combined with 5-fluorouracil and folinic acid to cisplatin combined with 5-fluorouracil in chemotherapy naive patients with advanced adenocarcinoma of the stomach or esophagogastric junction]]></title>
<link>http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/19/8/1450?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><b>Background:</b> We aimed to establish the superiority (or noninferiority if superiority was not achieved) in terms of time to progression (TTP) of irinotecan/5-fluorouracil (IF) over cisplatin/5-fluorouracil (CF) in chemonaive patients with adenocarcinoma of the stomach/esophagogastric junction.</p>
<p><b>Patients and methods:</b> Patients received either IF: i.v. irinotecan 80 mg/m<sup>2</sup> 30 min, folinic acid 500 mg/m<sup>2</sup> 2 h, 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) 2000 mg/m<sup>2</sup> 22 h, for 6/7 weeks or CF: cisplatin 100 mg/m<sup>2</sup> 1&ndash;3 h, with 5-FU 1000 mg/m<sup>2</sup>/day 24 h, days 1&ndash;5, every 4 weeks.</p>
<p><b>Results:</b> In all, 333 patients were randomized and treated (IF 170, CF 163). Patient characteristics were balanced except more IF patients had Karnofsky performance status 100%. TTP for IF was 5.0 months [95% confidence interval (CI) 3.8&ndash;5.8] and 4.2 months (95% CI 3.7&ndash;5.5) for CF (<I>P</I> = 0.088). Overall survival (OS) was 9.0 versus 8.7 months, response rate 31.8% versus 25.8%, time to treatment failure (TTF) 4.0 versus 3.4 months for IF and CF, respectively. The difference in TTF was statistically significant (<I>P</I> = 0.018). IF was better in terms of toxic deaths (0.6% versus 3%), discontinuation for toxicity (10.0% versus 21.5%), severe neutropenia, thrombocytopenia and stomatitis, but not diarrhea.</p>
<p><b>Conclusion:</b> IF did not yield a significant TTP or OS superiority over CF, and the results of noninferiority of IF were borderline. However, IF may provide a viable, platinum-free front-line treatment alternative for metastatic gastric cancer.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dank, M., Zaluski, J., Barone, C., Valvere, V., Yalcin, S., Peschel, C., Wenczl, M., Goker, E., Cisar, L., Wang, K., Bugat, R.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-07-28</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/annonc/mdn166</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Randomized phase III study comparing irinotecan combined with 5-fluorouracil and folinic acid to cisplatin combined with 5-fluorouracil in chemotherapy naive patients with advanced adenocarcinoma of the stomach or esophagogastric junction]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>European Society for Medical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>8</prism:number>
<prism:volume>19</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>1457</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-08-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>1450</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>gastrointestinal tumors</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/19/8/1458?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Quality of life and comorbidity score as prognostic determinants in non-small-cell lung cancer patients]]></title>
<link>http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/19/8/1458?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><b>Background:</b> Both quality of life (QoL) and comorbidity influence therapy and prognosis of non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). We previously developed a lung cancer disease-specific simplified comorbidity score (SCS) and demonstrated the prognostic impact of this disease-specific instrument. This study aimed at validating the SCS in a prospective bicentric NSCLC population by measuring its relative prognostic determinant impact taking into account well-established variables such as QoL, performance status (PS), Charlson comorbidity index (CCI) and disease stage.</p>
<p><b>Patients and methods:</b> Prognostic values of different pretherapeutic features were tested in univariate and multivariate analyses in a population of 301 NSCLC.</p>
<p><b>Results:</b> Median survival was 17 months. One-third of patients reporting difficulties in their normal daily activities and an overall poor QoL. The following pretreament variables were independent determinants of a shorter overall survival: advanced disease, SCS, Lung Cancer Symptoms Scale global symptoms score, anaemia, hyponatremia, serum alkaline phosphatases level, serum CYFRA 21-1 and serum neuron-specific enolase.</p>
<p><b>Conclusion:</b> In this extended validation population, the SCS is more informative than the CCI in predicting NSCLC patient outcome as the former is also more disease specific. Combination of both SCS comorbidity score and LSCC QoL yields a more accurate information that conventional analysis of PS.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jacot, W., Colinet, B., Bertrand, D., Lacombe, S., Bozonnat, M. -C., Daures, J. -P., Pujol, J. -L., for the OncoLR health network]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-07-28</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/annonc/mdn064</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Quality of life and comorbidity score as prognostic determinants in non-small-cell lung cancer patients]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>European Society for Medical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>8</prism:number>
<prism:volume>19</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>1464</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-08-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>1458</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>lung cancer</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/19/8/1465?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[A phase II multicenter study of oxaliplatin in combination with paclitaxel in poor prognosis patients who failed cisplatin-based chemotherapy for germ-cell tumors]]></title>
<link>http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/19/8/1465?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><b>Background:</b> The aim of this study is to determine feasibility and efficacy of the combination regimen oxaliplatin and paclitaxel in patients with cisplatin (CDDP)-refractory germ-cell tumors (GCT).</p>
<p><b>Patients and methods:</b> Patients with either a cisplatin absolute-refractory GCT defined as progressive disease (PD) during or within 1 month of CDDP administration or with a poor prognosis relapse, defined as PD between the second and the sixth month after CDDP administration, were treated with a combination of oxaliplatin (130 mg/m<sup>2</sup>) and paclitaxel (175 mg/m<sup>2</sup>) administered every 21 days. Primary end point was efficacy.</p>
<p><b>Results:</b> Twenty-seven patients were included. Patients were pretreated with a median of two lines of cisplatin-based chemotherapy (range 1&ndash;5). Sixteen patients were absolute refractory. Five patients had relapsed after high-dose chemotherapy plus stem-cell support. There were no complete responses but there was one marker-positive partial response and nine disease stabilization (34, 6%). After a median follow-up of 65 months, two patients are disease-free survivors. Main toxicity was leucocytopenia grade 3/4 in 30% of the patients.</p>
<p><b>Conclusion:</b> Combination chemotherapy with oxaliplatin and paclitaxel is feasible with acceptable toxicity and may be effective if combined with additional treatment in patients with CDDP-refractory GCT.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Theodore, C., Chevreau, C., Yataqhene, Y., Fizazi, K., Delord, J. -P., Lotz, J. -P., Geoffrois, L., Kerbrat, P., Bui, V., Flechon, A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-07-28</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/annonc/mdn122</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[A phase II multicenter study of oxaliplatin in combination with paclitaxel in poor prognosis patients who failed cisplatin-based chemotherapy for germ-cell tumors]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>European Society for Medical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>8</prism:number>
<prism:volume>19</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>1469</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-08-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>1465</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>urogenital tumors</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/19/8/1470?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[First-line bevacizumab combined with reduced dose interferon-{alpha}2a is active in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma]]></title>
<link>http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/19/8/1470?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><b>Background:</b> In patients with untreated metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC), progression-free survival (PFS) was longer with bevacizumab + interferon (IFN)- than IFN + placebo (AVOREN trial). In this hypothesis-generating study, subgroup analysis was carried out to determine the effect of IFN dose reduction.</p>
<p><b>Patients and methods:</b> A total of 649 patients received IFN 9 MIU s.c. three times weekly plus bevacizumab 10 mg/kg or placebo every 2 weeks until disease progression. The IFN dose was reduced to 6 or 3 MIU with the development of IFN-attributed toxicity. Differences between treatment arms in PFS, response rate and tolerability were analysed in the reduced-dose group.</p>
<p><b>Results:</b> IFN dose was reduced in 131 patients in the bevacizumab + IFN arm and 97 patients in the IFN + placebo arm during the trial. PFS rates in the bevacizumab + reduced-dose IFN group were comparable with the total population (Kaplan&ndash;Meier estimates of event-free rate at 1 year: 0.524 versus 0.427). Bevacizumab + reduced-dose IFN was well tolerated, with substantial decreases in the rate of adverse events following dose reduction.</p>
<p><b>Conclusion:</b> This retrospective subgroup analysis suggests that the dose of IFN can be reduced to manage side-effects while maintaining efficacy in patients with mRCC receiving bevacizumab + IFN.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Melichar, B., Koralewski, P., Ravaud, A., Pluzanska, A., Bracarda, S., Szczylik, C., Chevreau, C., Filipek, M., Delva, R., Sevin, E., Negrier, S., McKendrick, J., Santoro, A., Pisa, P., Escudier, B.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-07-28</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/annonc/mdn161</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[First-line bevacizumab combined with reduced dose interferon-{alpha}2a is active in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>European Society for Medical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>8</prism:number>
<prism:volume>19</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>1476</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-08-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>1470</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>urogenital tumors</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/19/8/1477?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Clinical heterogeneity of extranodal NK/T-cell lymphoma, nasal type: a national survey of the Korean Cancer Study Group]]></title>
<link>http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/19/8/1477?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><b>Background:</b> This national survey was undertaken to propose the classification of extranodal natural killer (NK)/T-cell lymphoma (NTCL) subtypes and to clarify a clinical heterogeneity.</p>
<p><b>Patients and methods:</b> Two hundred and eighty patients newly diagnosed as NTCL were enrolled from 22 Korean medical centers. Two subsets were compared: one involving the upper aerodigestive tract (UAT) and another involving the non-upper aerodigestive tract (NUAT) region, which comprises the skin, gastrointestinal tract, and liver or soft tissues. Clinical prognostic factors, survival outcomes, and independent predictors for survival were compared between each subset.</p>
<p><b>Results:</b> NUAT-NTCL (59 patients) had significantly higher proportions of disseminated disease, aggressive biologic features, and unfavorable host reactions compared with UAT-NTCL (221 patients). NUAT-NTCL had shortened 5-year overall survival (OS) (22% versus 41%, <I>P</I> = 0.001). Ann Arbor staging, the International Prognostic Index, and the NTCL prognostic index failed to predict the OS of NUAT-NTCL, but did predict the OS in UAT-NTCL. Independent predictors for OS by multivariate analyses differed between each subset. In the NUAT subset, extranodal sites and regional nodes predicted the OS, while Ann Arbor staging, age, performance status, and lactate dehydrogenase level predicted the OS in the UAT subset.</p>
<p><b>Conclusion:</b> NUAT-NTCL may represent a distinctive disease entity in terms of clinical factors, independent predictors, and survival outcomes.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kim, T. M., Lee, S. -Y., Jeon, Y. K., Ryoo, B. -Y., Cho, G. J., Hong, Y. S., Kim, H. J., Kim, S.-Y., Kim, C. S., Kim, S., Kim, J. S., Sohn, S. K., Song, H. H., Lee, J. L., Kang, Y. K., Yim, C. Y., Lee, W. S., Yuh, Y. J., Kim, C. W., Heo, D. S., for the Lymphoma Subcommittee of the Korean Cancer Study Group]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-07-28</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/annonc/mdn147</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Clinical heterogeneity of extranodal NK/T-cell lymphoma, nasal type: a national survey of the Korean Cancer Study Group]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>European Society for Medical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>8</prism:number>
<prism:volume>19</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>1484</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-08-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>1477</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>hematologic malignancies</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/19/8/1485?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Neutrophil role in in vivo anti-lymphoma activity of rituximab: FCGR3B-NA1/NA2 polymorphism does not influence response and survival after rituximab treatment]]></title>
<link>http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/19/8/1485?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><b>Background:</b> Neutrophils could play an important role in <I>in vivo</I> rituximab anti-lymphoma activity. FcRIIIb is expressed only by neutrophils and FcRIIIb-neutrophil antigen (NA)1/NA2 polymorphism influenced phagocytosis of immunoglobulin G1-opsonized particles. We formulated the hypothesis that if neutrophils are critical cells for <I>in vivo</I> rituximab activity, FcRIIIb-NA1/NA2 polymorphism could influence the response to rituximab.</p>
<p><b>Patients and methods:</b> <I>FCGR3B</I>-NA1/NA2 genotypes were determined in 46 patients having received rituximab for a previously untreated, follicular, non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. The clinical response and the disappearance of the <I>BCL2-JH</I> gene rearrangement in both peripheral blood and bone marrow were evaluated at 2 months (M2) and each year during 7 years.</p>
<p><b>Results</b>: They were 13% homozygous for <I>FCGR3B</I>-NA1, 61% homozygous for <I>FCGR3B</I>-NA1/NA2 and 26% heterozygous. The objective response rates at M2 were 67% in homozygous <I>FCGR3B</I>-NA1 patients compared with 75% in homozygous <I>FCGR3B</I>-NA2 and 75% in heterozygous patients (not significant). We found no difference for progression-free and overall survival by <I>FCGR3B</I>-NA1/NA2 genotypes.</p>
<p><b>Conclusion</b>: These results indicate no association between <I>FCGR3B</I>-NA1/NA2 polymorphism and response to rituximab indicating no significant role of phagocytosis mediated by neutrophils in <I>in vivo</I> mechanism of rituximab activity.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Cartron, G., Ohresser, M., Salles, G., Solal-Celigny, P., Colombat, P., Watier, H.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-07-28</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/annonc/mdn163</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Neutrophil role in in vivo anti-lymphoma activity of rituximab: FCGR3B-NA1/NA2 polymorphism does not influence response and survival after rituximab treatment]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>European Society for Medical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>8</prism:number>
<prism:volume>19</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>1487</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-08-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>1485</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>hematologic malignancies</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/19/8/1488?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Arsenic trioxide down-regulates antiapoptotic genes and induces cell death in mycosis fungoides tumors in a mouse model]]></title>
<link>http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/19/8/1488?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><b>Background:</b> Mycosis fungoides (MF) is the most frequent cutaneous T-cell lymphoma (CTCL). Arsenic trioxide (As<SUB>2</SUB>O<SUB>3</SUB>) has recently been shown to be effective against leukemias, so we studied whether As<SUB>2</SUB>O<SUB>3</SUB> induces apoptosis of CTCL cells <I>in vitro</I>. We further investigated if As<SUB>2</SUB>O<SUB>3</SUB> is effective in a MF mouse model.</p>
<p><b>Material and methods:</b> Annexin V/7-amino-actinomycin-D stainings were carried out to investigate if As<SUB>2</SUB>O<SUB>3</SUB> induced apoptosis of CTCL cell lines. To study the underlying mechanisms, the effects of As<SUB>2</SUB>O<SUB>3</SUB> on various transcription factors and apoptosis regulating proteins were analyzed by western blots, electrophoretic mobility shift assays and transcription factor enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays. The ability of As<SUB>2</SUB>O<SUB>3</SUB> to induce tumor regression was investigated in a MF mouse model.</p>
<p><b>Results:</b> As<SUB>2</SUB>O<SUB>3</SUB>-induced apoptosis was paralleled by a reduction of the DNA-binding activities of transcription factors of the NFkB and signal transducer and activator of transcription gene families and reduced expression of the antiapoptotic proteins bcl-1, bcl-xL and mcl-1. Local injections of 200 &micro;M As<SUB>2</SUB>O<SUB>3</SUB> into tumors caused complete remissions in five of six mice and one partial remission.</p>
<p><b>Conclusions:</b> As<SUB>2</SUB>O<SUB>3</SUB> induced apoptosis of CTCL cells by the down-regulation of transcription factors that stimulate the expression of antiapoptotic genes. Local injection of As<SUB>2</SUB>O<SUB>3</SUB> into MF tumor-bearing mice resulted in tumor regression.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tun-Kyi, A., Qin, J. -Z., Oberholzer, P. A., Navarini, A. A., Hassel, J. C., Dummer, R., Dobbeling, U.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-07-28</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/annonc/mdn056</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Arsenic trioxide down-regulates antiapoptotic genes and induces cell death in mycosis fungoides tumors in a mouse model]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>European Society for Medical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>8</prism:number>
<prism:volume>19</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>1494</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-08-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>1488</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>hematologic malignancies</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/19/8/1495?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Effects of an endurance and resistance exercise program on persistent cancer-related fatigue after treatment]]></title>
<link>http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/19/8/1495?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><b>Background:</b> Fatigue is a relevant problem of cancer patients during and after treatment. Several studies have shown that exercise can improve quality of life and functional status of cancer patients undergoing chemo- or radiotherapy. However, there is a lack of information about the effects of this intervention on persistent cancer-related fatigue. Therefore, we assessed the effects of an exercise program on cancer-related fatigue after treatment.</p>
<p><b>Patients and methods:</b> A consecutive series of 32 cancer patients with mild to severe persistent fatigue [scores on the Brief Fatigue Inventory (BFI) &gt; 25] participated in a 3-week exercise program consisting of endurance (30 min walking on a treadmill) and resistance/coordination exercises for the major muscle groups. Fatigue, mood, and anxiety were assessed with questionnaires and physical performance with a stress test before and after the program.</p>
<p><b>Results:</b> At the end of the program, we observed a significant increase of physical performance (workload at the anaerobic threshold pre 61 &plusmn; 26 W, post 78 &plusmn; 31 W, <I>P</I> &lt; 0.0001) and reduction of global fatigue (Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy: pre 45.7 &plusmn; 13.4, post 52.6 &plusmn; 12.4, <I>P</I> &lt; 0.0001; BFI: pre 37.9 &plusmn; 18.3, post 31.2 &plusmn;17.1, <I>P</I> &lt; 0.001). However, no significant improvement of cognitive fatigue or reduction of anxiety was observed.</p>
<p><b>Conclusions:</b> A 3-week exercise program leads to a substantial improvement of physical performance and reduction of mental and physical fatigue in cancer patients after treatment. However, this intervention does not affect depression, anxiety, or cognitive fatigue.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dimeo, F., Schwartz, S., Wesel, N., Voigt, A., Thiel, E.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-07-28</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/annonc/mdn068</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Effects of an endurance and resistance exercise program on persistent cancer-related fatigue after treatment]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>European Society for Medical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>8</prism:number>
<prism:volume>19</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>1499</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-08-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>1495</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>quality of life/supportive care/palliative care</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/19/8/1500?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Clinical impact of the methotrexate resistance-associated genes C-MYC and dihydrofolate reductase (DHFR) in high-grade osteosarcoma]]></title>
<link>http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/19/8/1500?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><b>Background:</b> Aims of this study were the validation of C-MYC involvement in methotrexate (MTX) resistance and the assessment of clinical impact of <I>C-MYC</I> and <I>dihydrofolate reductase (DHFR)</I> in osteosarcoma (OS).</p>
<p><b>Materials and methods:</b> The involvement of <I>C-MYC</I> in MTX resistance was validated with an antisense approach. C-MYC and DHFR protein levels at diagnosis were assessed by immunohistochemistry on series of patients treated with either a MTX-based protocol (IOR/OS-1; 72 patients) or with a standard four-drug regimen (ISG/SSG 1; 61 patients).</p>
<p><b>Results:</b> Down-regulation of <I>C-MYC</I> significantly decreased the MTX resistance level of OS cells, demonstrating its causal involvement in this phenomenon. In clinical samples, a worse outcome was associated with increased levels of DHFR and C-MYC at diagnosis in the IOR/OS-1 patients and of C-MYC in the ISG/SSG 1 patients.</p>
<p><b>Conclusions:</b> Meanwhile the adverse clinical impact of DHFR overexpression appeared to be closely related to the relevance of MTX in the chemotherapeutic protocol, that of C-MYC overexpression was more general and not strictly MTX related. The assessment of C-MYC and DHFR at diagnosis, together with that of other known prognostic markers, can be considered for an early identification of subgroups of OS patients with higher risk of adverse outcome.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Scionti, I., Michelacci, F., Pasello, M., Hattinger, C. M., Alberghini, M., Manara, M. C., Bacci, G., Ferrari, S., Scotlandi, K., Picci, P., Serra, M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-07-28</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/annonc/mdn148</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Clinical impact of the methotrexate resistance-associated genes C-MYC and dihydrofolate reductase (DHFR) in high-grade osteosarcoma]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>European Society for Medical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>8</prism:number>
<prism:volume>19</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>1508</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-08-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>1500</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>sarcomas and melanoma</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/19/8/1509?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Does oxaliplatin and paclitaxel combination show an activity of some extent in pretreated patients with germ-cell tumors?: Reply to the article "A phase II multicenter study of oxaliplatin in combination with paclitaxel in poor prognosis patients who failed cisplatin-based chemotherapy for germ-cell tumors" by C. Theodore et al. (Ann Oncol 2008; doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdn122)]]></title>
<link>http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/19/8/1509?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Necchi, A., Nicolai, N., Salvioni, R.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-07-28</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/annonc/mdn371</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Does oxaliplatin and paclitaxel combination show an activity of some extent in pretreated patients with germ-cell tumors?: Reply to the article "A phase II multicenter study of oxaliplatin in combination with paclitaxel in poor prognosis patients who failed cisplatin-based chemotherapy for germ-cell tumors" by C. Theodore et al. (Ann Oncol 2008; doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdn122)]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>European Society for Medical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>8</prism:number>
<prism:volume>19</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>1509</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-08-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>1509</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>letters to the editors</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/19/8/1509-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Infusion of trastuzumab maintenance doses over 30 minutes]]></title>
<link>http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/19/8/1509-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ring, A., Simcock, R., Mitra, S., Bloomfield, D., King, J., Simpson, S., Sadler, G., Webb, A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-07-28</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/annonc/mdn390</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Infusion of trastuzumab maintenance doses over 30 minutes]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>European Society for Medical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>8</prism:number>
<prism:volume>19</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>1510</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-08-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>1509</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>letters to the editors</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/19/8/1510?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Large bowel perforation associated with capecitabine treatment for breast cancer]]></title>
<link>http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/19/8/1510?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Cowman, S., Stebbing, J., Tuthill, M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-07-28</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/annonc/mdn397</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Large bowel perforation associated with capecitabine treatment for breast cancer]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>European Society for Medical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>8</prism:number>
<prism:volume>19</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>1511</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-08-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>1510</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>letters to the editors</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/19/8/1511?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Anthracyclines for gestational breast cancer: course and outcome of pregnancy]]></title>
<link>http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/19/8/1511?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Azim, H. A., Peccatori, F. A., Scarfone, G., Acaia, B., Rossi, P., Cascio, R., Goldhirsch, A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-07-28</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/annonc/mdn396</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Anthracyclines for gestational breast cancer: course and outcome of pregnancy]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>European Society for Medical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>8</prism:number>
<prism:volume>19</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>1512</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-08-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>1511</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>letters to the editors</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/19/8/1512?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Value of frontline autologous stem-cell transplantation in peripheral T-cell lymphoma]]></title>
<link>http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/19/8/1512?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Gutierrez, A., Rodriguez, J.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-07-28</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/annonc/mdn399</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Value of frontline autologous stem-cell transplantation in peripheral T-cell lymphoma]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>European Society for Medical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>8</prism:number>
<prism:volume>19</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>1512</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-08-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>1512</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>letters to the editors</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/19/8/1512-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Stopping a trial early in oncology: for patients or for industry?]]></title>
<link>http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/19/8/1512-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Whitehead, J., Cobo, E.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-07-28</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/annonc/mdn410</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Stopping a trial early in oncology: for patients or for industry?]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>European Society for Medical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>8</prism:number>
<prism:volume>19</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>1513</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-08-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>1512</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>letters to the editors</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/19/8/1515?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Cologne high-dose sequential chemotherapy in relapsed and refractory Hodgkin lymphoma: results of a large multicenter study of the German Hodgkin Lymphoma Study Group (GHSG)]]></title>
<link>http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/19/8/1515?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-07-28</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/annonc/mdn411</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Cologne high-dose sequential chemotherapy in relapsed and refractory Hodgkin lymphoma: results of a large multicenter study of the German Hodgkin Lymphoma Study Group (GHSG)]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>European Society for Medical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>8</prism:number>
<prism:volume>19</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>1515</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-08-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>1515</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>erratum</prism:section>
</item>

</rdf:RDF>